Tuesday, December 31, 2013

The Power of Powerlessness

God's greatest demonstration of His omnipotence was His free choice not to exercise His omnipotence.  

To have power and not to use it - this is the essence of true freedom.  

Human beings are rarely capable of such freedom.  We see the demonstration of power as freedom, so we think we are more free the more we demonstrate our power.  And it becomes an addiction: we clutch at power, we grasp at it, we fight for it, we want to show it off when we have it.  We fail to see that we are no longer free, but slaves to power.  

But to have the opportunity to grasp power - and not to grasp it; to have the opportunity to use power - but not to use it - this is true power, this is true freedom.

That is why Jesus said the first must be last, the master must become the servant.  To become like God, we must show that we are not slaves to power.  

The test is always: are we serving God and others?  In other words: is power being put at the service of love?  For power must be made subservient to love.  Power is not the ultimate value; love is.  And sometimes this means power must not exercise itself if its exercise would contradict the working of love.

Love is why God "emptied Himself" of His power, making Himself vulnerable and contingent to time and space, making Himself susceptible to change and injury and death.  This happened most dramatically at the Incarnation, but the Incarnation was not the only time in human history that God has chosen this kenosis.  In all His interactions with mankind, God gives up His power and places it at the service of His love.  We see it in His conversations with Adam and Eve, with Abraham, with Moses.  He is willing to sacrifice His right to exercise His power because He loves them.  He is willing to make Himself subject to the whims of mankind because He loves them.  The transcendent God makes Himself immanent out of love for us - a desire to be close to us.  The impassible God makes Himself passible - He suffers out of love for us.  In His omnipotence this is the choice He makes.  He chooses to remember us.

Real-World Marriage

A few of my former high school students have posted a link to this article on Facebook recently: "23 Things To Do Instead of Getting Engaged Before You're 23."  As someone who did get married when she was 23, I immediately felt a little defensive when I read the title.  But when I read the article I wanted to laugh at the author's characterization of marriage.  Considering her naive understanding of what marriage entails, it's probably good that this author isn't considering marriage for herself anytime soon.

"Someday I want to get married too," the author says.  "I want a floor-length dress with a ton of cleavage.  I want it to be in Asia, with Ethiopian food, and a filthy scotch selection to calm my nerves."  Sweetheart, I hate to break it to you, but you're describing a wedding, not a marriage.  What you really want is a wedding.  If you think that floor-length dress in an Asian venue with Ethiopian food and scotch describes a marriage, you've got a huge surprise ahead of you.  And please - don't get married anytime soon, until you've corrected this misunderstanding.  

If you really wanted a marriage, you'd say: "I want arguments with my spouse about how to divvy up the housework, I want to feel jealous and angry about how much time my husband spends at work, I want to deal with him feeling angry and jealous about how much time I spend at work, I want to spend my nights staying up with a screaming child, I want to argue with my spouse about whose turn it is to skip work when the kids are sick, I want to feel neglected and lonely at times, I want to fight for my right to my own space at other times, I want to sacrifice what I want to do for the good of the family, I want fights about which set of in-laws to spend the holidays with, I want worry and anxiety and stress and heartbreak and tears."  

You'd also say: "I want to become a less selfish, more giving person; I want the deep joy that comes from building and nurturing a family; I want the love that can only come after suffering through stressful times with another person."

The problem is that many 23-year-olds, like this author, confuse the wedding with the marriage.  She is certainly right to say that for many people marrying young is an impulsive and perhaps not wholly wise decision.  However, I don't think the alternatives she suggests in her list of twenty-three things to do are going to help young people learn the wisdom and maturity necessary to become ready for a marriage.  Make out with a stranger?  Stand naked in front of a window?  Date two people at once?  If you're going to suggest alternatives to what you perceive as an immature act, perhaps your alternatives should not be other immature - and possibly even hurtful - acts.  And if, as the author claims, she truly wants a marriage one day, she's going to have to prepare herself with better behaviors than these.

And for some young people, marrying young is not impulsive or unwise.  I object to the notion that marriage means "settling down" or even "settling."  And I absolutely object to her implication that marriage means the "end of all fun experiences."  For goodness' sake, half of her suggestions could still be done even when you're married!  Married people are in bands, travel the world, bake cakes, have pets, do CrossFit, write in blogs, and so on.  Why does she think this will end when she gets married?  

Nor are any of the items on her list as challenging or difficult - or as rewarding and life-giving - as marriage is.  She says that marriage means "hiding behind your significant other" instead of "dealing with life's ups and downs"?  Please!  I didn't know what life's "ups and downs" really meant until I got married and had kids!  She thinks marriage means "hiding from the big scary world"?  Marriage is the big scary world!  It's a world of self-sacrifice and self-giving.  It's a world of relentless demands on one's time and generosity.  It requires the humility to learn from another person, to admit when you're wrong, to say you're sorry.  It requires the strength to fight for your spouse, for your children, to stand with them and beside them.  It means dealing not only with your own problems, but taking on theirs as well.  The reason the divorce rate is so high is precisely because marriage is so difficult and challenging, and - if this article is any indication - no one is teaching young people how to rise to this challenge.  If marriage, as this author seems to believe, were truly a matter of comfortably hiding from the world, why would anyone want to leave its safe confines?  Her married friends are experiencing the "real world" far more fully than she is.  It seems to me that she's the one who's scared.

Marriage has pushed me beyond my boundaries far more than any of her twenty-three suggestions would.  Marriage has, indeed, been the biggest challenge of my life.  Every day it demands that I put aside my own selfishness and put another's concerns ahead of my own.  It has forced me to overcome jealousy and envy, pettiness and pride.  It has taught me how to compromise and to truly listen to another person.  It has taught me empathy and made me more compassionate.  It has taught me how to be committed to something through thick and thin - and believe me, there's been a lot of "thick" to overcome - rather than giving up at the first sign of inconvenience to myself or my own plans.  It has taught me how to find blessings in unexpected places.  It has taught me gratitude and given me joy - the joy of building something lasting with another human being.  In short it has made me a better person.  And I don't see her twenty-three suggestions doing that for anyone.

Friday, December 20, 2013

The Queen Foretold

Mary was foreshadowed in the great mothers of the people of Israel: in Sarah, in Rebecca, in Hannah.  But in the Office of Readings today St. Bernard's sermon on the Annunciation brought to mind another Old Testament woman who foreshadows Mary: Queen Esther.

Bernard writes: "We. . . are waiting, O Lady, for your word of compassion; the sentence of condemnation weighs heavily upon us. The price of our salvation is offered to you. We shall be set free at once if you consent. . . Tearful Adam with his sorrowing family begs this of you, O loving Virgin. . . Abraham begs it, David begs it. All the other holy patriarchs, your ancestors, ask it of you, as they dwell in the country of the shadow of death. This is what the whole earth waits for, prostrate at your feet."  One can hear the plea of Mordecai, of the Jews, as they waited to know whether Esther would approach the king and beg for the redemption of her people.  

Seeing Mary as typified by Esther allows new insight into her intercessory role.  Her "yes" was an act of obedience to God, yes, but also one of compassion for the rest of mankind.  By agreeing to bear Jesus - with all the anxieties and sorrows that such a life would entail for her - she was a more perfect Esther, who agreed to intercede for her people despite the threat to her life.  

Obedience to God is inseparable from love of others.  Compassion for one's fellow men, a willingness to descend into the "country of the shadow of death" in order to assist them.  Esther used her position as Queen to protect her people: despite her initial wavering, in the end she cast her lot with those who dwelt in the "shadow of death," with the anawim, the bowed-down ones who prostrated themselves before her.  Mary, though she is Queen of heaven, still bows down to us; she casts her lot with us who suffer and sorrow here on earth, she agrees to suffer and sorrow with us.  

The image of all creation waiting breathlessly for Mary's answer: Why do you delay, why are you afraid?  In this tender, loving exchange between angel and virgin, our eyes are trained on the virgin - and her quiet "fiat," uniting her mind and soul and body to the Lord, resounds throughout our hearts.

--------------------------
"In my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink."  

St Therese says that Jesus thirsts for our souls, our love.  Do we give him, then, souls that are embittered and sour, like vinegar?  Do we give him love that is impure, tainted, curdled?  Let your soul be a sponge soaked in the fresh dew of the Spirit, so that when Christ comes to drink, you can raise up to him a heart full of living water.

--------------------------

I wonder sometimes about the difference between Mary's "How can this be, since I have no relations with a man?" and Zechariah's "How will I know this, as I am an old man?"  Mary is the one who is "blessed because she believes," but Zechariah is cursed for not believing - indeed, his curse is his "sign" that the messenger is from God.  

Mary's question shows that her faith is not blind.  I don't think God rejects our questioning into His workings - to understand how God works in the world.  But I think we run into problems when we seek a sign to convince us that God is at work in the world.  Perhaps that's the difference between Mary and Zechariah.  Mary wanted to know how God would work in her life; Zechariah wanted to know that it was God at work in his life.  Mary's faith consisted of seeing God at work in all parts of her life.  May she help me to grow in that faith as well.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

On Fear and Patience

Yesterday at Adult Catechesis we watched the episode about Mary from Fr. Barron's Catholicism series.  During the discussion afterwards, I mentioned that since becoming a mother I feel closer to Mary's human side as a a mother, and I suggested that perhaps Mary went to visit Elizabeth because she was afraid and anxious about what the angel had told her - a message that would leave her unwed and pregnant.  "Nonsense!" exclaimed one older lady who was present.  "Our Lady had no fear!  She was above such human concerns!"

Her reaction took me aback.  When I tried to say that even Jesus expressed "human emotions" such as fear and sorrow, she said: "I'm not going to argue with you.  But let me just say that we shouldn't focus on their human side.  We should call our minds to the divine."

Nice words, and I wasn't going to argue with an elderly lady who obviously did not want further discussion on the topic.  But her vehemence made me think of Augustine, who argues, in one of his homilies on the Psalms, that before we can ascend to the divine with Christ, we have to descend with Him into the "valley of tears" - the world of human concerns.  If we hasten too quickly and try to grasp the divine without humbling ourselves in the "valley" of all those messy human experiences like fear and sorrow, Augustine says, we will never reach our goal.  We must follow the path Christ laid out before us - a path of descent and ascent.

When I thought about my conversation with the elderly lady more, I realized that perhaps it was frightening to think of Mary as someone who felt afraid, who felt anxious, who felt worried.  After all, if Mary isn't strong enough to defeat those human weaknesses, then who is?  And if this lady needs Mary to be her strong-armed, strong-willed Mother, then I don't want to tread on that image.  But I do hope I planted the seed of a different understanding of Mary: one that sees her strength flowing from her experience of human weakness.  

Is this not what we believe about our God as well?  God was not content to stay on the "divine side" of things, in some rarefied place beyond human conception.  He came down to the human side - He became human in all things but sin.  And as far as I know, feeling afraid for one's life and feeling anxiety about the future are not sins but rather part and parcel of the human experience of being limited in knowledge and understanding. 

Jesus taught that strength comes from allowing ourselves to be weak.  It comes from recognizing our dependence on others.  Christian "strength" is not the strength of the world - it is not a strength that means self-sufficiency or independence.  Christian strength is comprised of the strength of the Church, the Body of Christ made visible within our human community and sanctified by the presence of the Spirit.  When Mary went to visit her cousin, perhaps she recognized that she could not do her task alone.  She would need Elizabeth's support, Joseph's support, the help of her family and her community.   Perhaps her wisdom in accepting her very human needs is something we can emulate in this world which sees weakness in asking for help.

----------------------------------------------------------

In the same homily on the Psalms, I read Augustine's warning about not to clinging to the "temporal," and it occurred to me that too often we interpret this word as having to do with material goods, when really the word comes from the Latin for time, not matter.  Of course material goods exist "temporally" in the sense that they come into being at a particular point in time and cease to be at a particular point in time, but I wonder if maybe thinking of the temporal as specifically having to do with time might shift our conceptions a little bit.  

Last Sunday the second reading at Mass was about the patience of the farmer who tills his soil while waiting for the rains.  The farmer cannot make the rains come, but he can prepare his land for the proper season.  If he tried to spend his time worrying about the rains or trying to make the rain fall, he'd be wasting his time.  Wisely, he knows that it is better to be patient - to wait, to offer his time to God in prayerful expectation, and to make good use of the time he has.  

Augustine tells us to submit our temporal blessings to God - not just material things like our money or our possessions, but time itself.  Just like our possessions should be put to use to give God glory, so too should our time.  When things go according to our plans, we should acknowledge it as a blessing from God and give thanks to Him - but when they don't, we should be able to say with Job: "The Lord gives and the Lord takes away."  For those who struggle with patience as I do, I think it helps to think of all our time as a gift from God that we must offer back to Him.  When when we cannot do things according to our own schedules - well, what a gift, what an opportunity to offer that time to God - to make sure it is not wasted, to give it back to God in prayer!  Don't waste your time trying to change things you can't fix.  Do what you can do - offer it to God.

The people of Israel were patient.  They had to be.  They could not make their Messiah come.  They kept their eyes trained on heaven, waiting anxiously for the "acceptable time, the day of salvation."  During Advent we too share their patience and their hope.  Advent - this time of waiting - is such a wonderful time to practice patience: that fine art of waiting without wasting time, of responding graciously when our plans go awry, of giving generously of our own time, of respecting the time of others.    

Monday, December 16, 2013

To seek the truth

Why did Jesus refuse to answer the chief priests who questioned him?  Because they did not seek the truth; rather, they sought to entrap him.  Jesus uncovered their own deceitfulness by asking them from where the authority of John came.  Instead of answering according to their consciences and true knowledge, they treated the question as a political game - an opportunity to jockey for power.  They did not want to lose their reputation before the people, and they were willing to sacrifice the truth in order to maintain their authority.

Jesus does not wish to play this game.  If we come seeking only to test him, or seeking only to glorify ourselves, Jesus will not reveal the truth to us - indeed, we will not be able to see or answer for the truth.  St. Augustine says that sinful human beings want to reveal the truth without being revealed by the truth, so God instead reveals our true selves to us while keeping the truth - which is Himself - hidden.  This is precisely what happens here: the chief priests are revealed as hypocrites and frauds, but the truth about Jesus remains concealed from them.

But we know that if we approach Jesus with humility, seeking truth and not seeking deception, then He will answer us.  If we genuinely seek the truth, we will find it.  And, if we genuinely seek the truth about Christ, we must not be afraid to let Christ reveal us to ourselves.  Throughout the Gospels we see Jesus liberating people to become their true selves.  He reveals their weaknesses so that He can heal them and set them free.  And while revealing those weaknesses He also uncovers our hidden strengths, showing us the courage that we never knew we had.  

Let God reveal our weaknesses.  He is a gentle, loving healer; He will care for us tenderly.  Let Him reveal our strengths; He will only delight in them and augment them, for "to the one who already has more will be given."  Let Him reveal Himself: the one who commands praise and love.  Seek truth, not power.  

Thursday, December 12, 2013

To bear witness

Our Lady of Guadalupe

Our faith is not a faith based in idealistic dreams.  It is a faith based on concrete reality: the reality of what God has done for His people in history.  The Israelites professed this in their Psalms: they recognized that their people could not have been victorious over their oppressors and foes without the help of God.  This victory was a very real victory: a military victory that enabled the Israelites to claim real territory as their own.

Yet we who are steeped in a more ambivalent and relativistic culture do not like to think of God as helping the Israelites defeat other peoples in battle.  For what then of the other peoples?  What of the peoples whose first-born sons were slaughtered, who were displaced and lost their homes?  It seems a real injustice to suppose that God favored the Israelites over others.
 
But I do think that if we read the Old Testament carefully, we find hints that, though the Scriptures tell the story of God’s unique relationship with the Israelites, God also never forgets that He is the Father too of all other peoples.  Theologians and biblical scholars have different ways of expressing this: God is covenanted to the Israelites but also holds forth a promise to the rest of humanity. 

It’s important for us as a Church to remember this.  We have a special relationship with God as the Body of Christ on earth.  But God does not forget other peoples, and the promises He gives to the Church also extend to non-Catholic Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, secular atheists – all of humanity.
 
It is also important for the Church to bear witness to God’s action within its own history.  At times this will require the Church to repent for its own sins, just as the Israelites did throughout biblical times.  But it also requires us not to be timid about professing the blessings which God has wrought through the Church.  To be sure, to speak of God’s action in and through the Church will expose us to ridicule from people who do not want or are not able to see God at work in the world.  They will say we were deluded, or blind, or try to find some purely human causes for what the eyes of faith interpret as the work of God.  But we must bear witness nevertheless to the hope that God has brought into the world through the concrete reality of His Church.

I was reading in National Geographic about a woman from Iran who converted to Christianity through devotion to Mary Magdalene.  She was so astonished to discover in Christ a man who regarded a woman so highly that He appeared to her first, before his male friends!  Women, she said, were invisible in her own country (much the way they probably were in first-century Israel), but Jesus – and the Scriptures which recorded His life, and the Church which bore witness to His memory – made them visible.  In this woman’s life, the work of the Church (despite its own sins and flaws and confusion with regard to the treatment of women) brought hope and a knowledge of her own dignity as a daughter of God.

Today is the feast of the Virgin of Guadalupe, who appeared to a poor Indian in Mexico and gave him the courage to claim equal dignity to the European Spaniards.  God’s promise extends even to the Indians!  His life, too, testifies to the work of God in human history: God’s promise stretching to encompass the entire world.

Individual Catholics must also bear witness to the concrete reality of God in their own lives.  We cannot divorce Christian truths from their physical manifestations.  A purely over-spiritualized Christianity is the luxury of the privileged.  Consider Christians in Nigeria who risk their lives to attend church on Sundays and must be attended by armed guards.  Yet they go!  But here in this country, many people who profess to believe in God do not go to church at all.  They are too busy, they can’t fit it into their schedules, they can praise GOd just fine outside of church.  Meanwhile, Nigerian Christians are willing to die for something that we in America take for granted.  Their witness, too, is a concrete witness to God in the world.  

We in America often think it’s good enough to worship God in sunsets and rainbows, on mountaintops or ocean sides.  We do not think it necessary to take the concrete action of devoting our time and moving our bodies to a physical space dedicated to worship.  But that movement means something.  It means something to the Nigerians.  It means something to the woman from Iran who went on pilgrimage to the shrine of Mary Magdalene in France.  It meant something to Juan Diego, who trekked up and down the mountain carrying the flowers of the Virgin.  These concrete realities that demand something of our time and our bodies: this is how we bear witness to our God at work in the world.


This is the meaning of the Incarnation.  God was not content with speaking to us from a cloud or inspiring us what a “feeling.”  He came to us in the flesh.  He came to us in space and time.  He sacrificed Himself in space and time.  Do we dare second-guess God by supposing it’s good enough to have an overly interiorized faith that risks devolving into self-centered sentimentality?

We are called to bear witness with our words - real words.  We are called to bear witness with our actions - concrete actions.  When God has blessed you, don't be afraid to tell the world about it!  When you feel the Holy Spirit calling you to do good, don't be afraid to do it!  Think of the Iranian woman unashamed of the tears coursing down her face as she prayed for the intercession of Mary Magdalene.  Think of the Nigerian family braving militant groups to make it to church.  Think of Juan Diego who, though an illiterate Indian, told the bishop what to do.  Let their witness give strength to your witness.  Let the fires of their faith set your faith on fire.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

In the Wilderness

In some exegetical circles, much has been made of the fact that Luke transforms Isaiah's prophecy of "a voice crying out: in the desert prepare the way of the Lord'" into "a voice crying out in the desert: prepare the way of the Lord."  I think John the Baptist could be seen fulfilling each of these roles (he was, after all, in the desert preaching to people in the desert), but I do think Isaiah's version captures something special.  

Deserts are dry, barren places.  Wildernesses are, by definition, wild and chaotic.  The entire story of the Old Testament is about God bringing life to the barren, order to chaos.  

Our world needs prophets.  Our world is in many ways a spiritual desert: dry, barren, full of people so desperate and greedy and hungry and thirsty that they grasp at any kind of nectar dripping from any poisoned fruit.  Our world is a wilderness: in their confusion and twisted attempts at self-justification which lead only to self-delusion, people are lost and do not know where to turn.  We need prophets with the courage of John the Baptist to go into this desert, into this wilderness, and proclaim: "Prepare the way of the Lord!"

Yet in order to become like John the Baptist, we need to recognize the barrenness and chaos of our own hearts.  My soul: a barren place, where I die many deaths of pride and selfishness.  My heart: a wilderness, full of darkness and the brambles of my own vices and sins that block my path.  I need to prepare the way of the Lord into my own heart - clear a way to Him, make straight His paths.  

But how do I do this?  Isaiah says that the valleys must be raised and the mountains made level.  But Isaiah also says that God alone is the one who can do this: "I will make all my mountains a road," says the Lord (49:11), "I will go before you and level the mountains" (45:2).  God alone can clear a path for Himself so that He can come into my heart.  The Psalms tell us that God alone can show us the path to Him (25:4).  We must entrust our journey to Him (37:5). 

Only when we trust the Lord can He act on our behalf.  Only when we wholeheartedly and fully give over our path to Him can He truly raise the valleys and level the mountains, water the desert and clear the wilderness.  It is this faith - this total trust - that God asks from us.  Don't hold anything back!  Say to God: "Take me wherever You will!"  This is how to prepare our hearts for the coming of the Lord.

Yet how often do we cling to our own expectations of how our lives ought to go!  Do we think Mary planned to be an unwed mother at sixteen?  Did she plan to watch her only Son die before her very eyes?  Did Joseph plan to marry a woman who was pregnant with a child that was not his?  Scripture is full of people whose expectations and hopes and dreams for a quiet, peaceful, self-centered life were absolutely shattered by God's call.  Perhaps they were busy doing perfectly ordinary, perfectly good things.  It is not a sin to be a fisherman, but it is a sin to cling to being a fisherman when God calls you to something greater.  To cling to these expectations is to say no to God.  It is to say: I prefer the chaos and darkness of my own will to the clean bright light of Yours.  It is to be like the servant who clung greedily to the one talent he was entrusted with.  This is not life - this is death!  So the servant has his talent snatched from him and he is cast aside.

The unexpected call of God encounters us every day.   In traffic jams and thwarted dinner plans.  In unplanned pregnancies.  In the deaths of our loved ones.  In chance encounters with strangers that change our lives.  In phone calls from family and friends asking for help.  In the faces of the homeless and poor on our city benches and street corners.  In the people who annoy us and challenge our charity and kindness.  Jesus told Peter to be prepared: one day, he would be led where he did not want to go.  And God is constantly calling each of us to go where we do not want to go!  Every time our plans are disappointed, it is up to us to find God there: calling us out of our complacency, asking us to practice sacrificing our will, forcing us to recognize that our time is not ours, and ultimately neither are our lives.  Saying "yes" to these little moments of self-sacrifice prepares us to see the bigger ways in which God calls us to say "yes" - the "yes" that can give shape and meaning to our lives.  The "yes" that can make straight the path of the Lord in the wilderness of our souls - and our world.

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Taking God at His Word

1.  St Peter tells us that faith is only the beginning of the journey.  Love is the end.  Along the way we may meet, in no particular order: goodness, self-control, patience, devotion, kindness.

2.  God knows me better than I know myself.  So why do I second-guess Him about His plans for my life?  Why do I doubt and worry, when I ought to know that He will not put me where He does not want me to be, nor will He abandon me when I am there.  Even if there are situations that I do not think I can bear, I do not have to bear them - I have simply to give them to Him.  How many times has this been true in my life, yet how easily do I forget and fail to trust!  God knows better.  To believe this means to have the faith of a child.

3.  If God loves each one of us uniquely, personally, and deeply, what right have we not to love one another?  How could we second-guess the love of God and deny another person's lovableness?  Even more - how can we in justice deny our love to any person, when God has deemed all persons worthy of love?  Even if we cannot see how or why a person could or should be loved, it should be enough for us to remember that God loves that person, and we who claim to love God must also love that person - not ourselves, but Christ in us.

4.  Be still and know I am God.  Sometimes I wonder if God does not feel like a parent with many hyperactive children.  Perhaps He simply wants to put His hands on our shoulders and say: "Just SIT STILL!"  He wants us to be still - to listen to Him, to pay attention to Him, and ultimately to love Him.  And we can do none of those things if we are constantly running frantic.

Friday, November 1, 2013

Trinitarian Anthropology

Feast of All Saints

Reading Augustine.

An anthropology of the Trinity: Trinity as memory, understanding, will.  

God remembers: the phrase recurs throughout the Old Testament.  He remembered Noah, Abraham, Rachel.  To sin is to forget God.  

What is memory?  Not mere recollection of things past.  Memory makes present.  It is mindfulness.  Making the mind full of the presence of the remembered one.   Even more: memory as being aware of what is in your mind.  God is always present with us.  Christ promised us so.  He is always in us.  We must be made to remember Him.  He remembers us because we are in Him.  So too must we remember Him.

Understanding: God as wisdom, Spirit as wisdom.  What is wisdom?  An intellectual assent, yes.  But also an assent of love.  Understanding comes through love, not through reason alone.  We must love before we can understand.  "If today you hear His voice, harden not your hearts."

Will:  Jesus says, For I have come to do not my will but the will of the one who sent me.  Can we echo these words of Christ?  Is not Christ's will also the will of the one who sent me?  He can only do what He sees His father doing.  To unite one's will so closely with God's is the goal of our life.

The Trinity as epistemologically necessary.  Memory, understanding, will - united in love: these are actions requiring an agent and another being upon whom the agent acts.  Even will cannot exist on its own: it requires the unifying of one will with another, in love.  Christ's unity with the Father through the Spirit.  

Our being made in God's image is not a static thing.  It is an active principle: we are in imago Dei because we have the ability to remember God, to understand and attain wisdom, to unite our wills with God, and to love God.  We are like God because we have the capacity to remember, understand, will, and love.  We fulfill our destiny as children of God by engaging those capacities to the best of our abilities - as the Spirit wills.

How does asceticism help us engage these capacities?  It clears out that which gets in the way: other things that fill our minds and distract from God, other things that occupy our quest for understanding, other things that direct our wills, other things that become objects of our love.  Asceticism does not deny the body but rather affirms it - seeks to make it holy, recognizes it as the vehicle by which our capacities are realized.  It is training the body, to make it a fitting home for a soul that is in imago Dei.  Shall we say that practicing the piano is a denial of musical talent?  No: it is an affirmation of and development of that talent.  So too is asceticism an affirmation and exercise of the body.

Critiques of Augustinian asceticism as too inwardly focused, rather than outwardly focused on sharing in the mystery of Christ's suffering: are the two understandings mutually exclusive?  Not if Christ is in us.  But perhaps balancing Augustine's perspective with the more concrete reality of the historical, crucified Christ is useful.  Still, they can coexist.  If asceticism aims to purify our understanding, memory, will, and love, then we can see Christ's suffering as purifying our suffering.  Christ purified all that He touched - made holy all He encountered.  In encountering suffering Christ purified it, so that when we encounter suffering we can be purified by it.  Asceticism as sharing in the mystery of Christ's purifying passion is also the same asceticism that seeks to purify the soul, make it fulfill its destiny as an image of God.

Created out of nothingness: a powerful image.  We dangle over the gaping gate of chaos.  Christ pulls us up, but how terrifying to look down, to descend back into the darkness and nothingness!  God constantly calls us into being - each moment of every day, He calls.  And the fullness of being lies in Him.  And so He calls us to Himself.

Faith and good works: a chicken and egg question.  Both exist in the realm of the Spirit.  From the beginning of our existence we existed in and through and with God.  Why ask which comes first when the Spirit that inspires them both is ever-present?

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Backward-Thinking

1.  I am not conservative.  I am traditional.  There is a difference.  Tradition can be the most radical force in the world.

2.  On Catholic radio yesterday I heard a priest downplaying God's role in the slaughter the Canaanites in Deuteronomy.  "The Israelites thought that's what God wanted - but that's not what he really wanted."  For some reason this explanation does not sit well with me.  We can't simply write off the parts of Scripture that we think are incompatible with human understandings of justice by saying that the Israelites "didn't know any better."  Perhaps they didn't, but they had a theological reason for saying that God ordered the deaths of the Canaanite women and children, and we can't dismiss that reason.  Nor does it sit well with me to argue that, "Well, the Canaanites had it coming, they were so sinful!"  Perhaps the Canaanites were sinful, but God also declares His ongoing love for the sinner throughout Scripture.

So what can it mean?  What is the lesson?  There is the lesson that a sinful people will call down the wrath of God.  There is a lesson that God's will takes precedence over human judgment.  There is a lesson that disobedience to God is not to be tolerated.  It is not a story for Canannites, but a story told to Israelites to warn them about the cost of straying from God.

But perhaps, fundamentally, there is no lesson.  Perhaps it something meant to disturb us, shake us up out of our notion that God will always be good and kind to us no matter what, so that we can then dismiss Him from our minds and lives.  Perhaps the story was meant to sound a note of discord, to shake us out of complacency.  The story of the Canaanites sits heavy upon us, undigested and unassimilable.  Reminding us that we can never understand fully the mind of God.

We want God to be rational according to our notion of reason.  We want God to be just according to our notion of justice.  We are shocked when He isn't.  We are reminded that He is the source of reason, He is the source of justice, and when He seems to break the rules He has established it is only because we have failed to truly understand them.

3.  Imagine: you have a friend you know very well.  This friend is always a good and kind person.  But one day he begins to act in a shocking way, a manner out of conformity with his previous behavior, a manner that seems cruel and unfair.  What is your first assumption?  That the kind person you always knew is actually a vicious and evil person - or that there must be a good reason for this shift in behavior?

Why can we not offer the same benefit of the doubt to God?  And to do so without cooking up false reasons to explain His behavior.  To accept God as He is, entirely in His inscrutability.  Is that not, finally, the lesson of Job?

4.  What does self-determination mean?  I am so tired of hearing about it.  The pressure to "determine oneself" is an awful pressure.  It is not freedom.  It is entrapment, deprivation.  It is awful and confusing and chaotic and miserable.

No one determines themselves.  The self is determined in relationship to others, and especially to God.  And we all have a god, whether we acknowledge it or not.  (Chesterton said: There are two kinds of people in the world: those who are dogmatic and know it, and those who are dogmatic and don't know it.)  The self is forged in a dialectic between the individual and the world around the individual.  It does not exist except in relationship to others.

What is this notion of not wanting to foist your pre-conceived notions on others?  You don't have to color within the lines, you don't have to play by the rules.  It makes me want to pull out my hair.  There is no real creativity without some sense of structure.  And rules exist to provide structure.  They pass on the wisdom of those who came before.  They give us something to test ourselves and our ideas against.  Why deprive our children of that benefit?

5.  What can I say to justify myself?  Nothing.  I can only say: I am sorry.  I did not do enough.  I did not love enough.  I did not try hard enough.  I did not give enough.  I could have done more, I should have done more.  I can only point to Christ's wounds and say: do not reject Your Son's sacrifice.  He loved me though I did not deserve it.  Let me hide behind His wounds.  Let me bathe them in my tears.  I am sorry.

6.  I am grateful today to be alive.  I thank God that He has kept me alive this day.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Who Has Eyes to See

We tend to see God in good, pleasant, pleasurable things.  The glorious rainbow my son and I saw last week driving home from the grocery store.  Sunsets, flowers.  Peaceful, gentle, loving feelings.  

And God is there, it is true.  But Scripture isn't there to teach us that easy message of finding God in the beautiful.  (Don't get me started on the 'spiritual but not religious' folk who claim they find God more in rainbows and sunsets than in churches.)  Scripture's radical message is that God is also present - and perhaps even more present - in painful, difficult, terrifying, awful, hideous things.  In death, decay, despair.  In barrenness and sorrow.  The grain of wheat that must die.  The yeast that makes bread impure.  The vinegar that only increases thirst.  In the Crucifixion - the broken and beaten man who hung bleeding on the cross.  God is in the midst of all these things.  How do we find Him there?

The message of Scripture - the message of the parable of the grain of wheat and of the leaven - is not only the (rather trite) moral that "small things can make a big difference," but also that those small deaths, those moments of sorrow and thirst, are small compared to the abundance of life God's creative grace can yield out of it.  The point is just as much about the death of the mustard seed as it is about its size.  When we are suffering we can feel so small.  We feel that our pain exists in a vast and empty and desolate place where no one can reach, no one can care.  We find no meaning for any of it.  It is lonely, comfortless chaos.  We are tiny specks in the universe, and we are dying.  Where is God?

God does not minimize human suffering.  He does not deny or negate its reality.  Yes, the death is real.  The dark night is real.  The corruption and the sorrow and the decay: they are real. But He invites us to recognize His powerful creativity in the midst of those moments: those moments when we feel there is nothing but death and barrenness, when we are most hopeless and despairing.

St. Clement points to nature as containing hints or clues - signs of God at work in the natural cycle of destruction and creation.  Behold, I make all things new!  The Old Testament itself reflects this dynamism: salvation is not a linear event, but an upward spiral of falling and rising and falling again.  Christ Himself points to nature as revelatory of God's plan for all the world.  And, as St. Paul tells us, nature, too, waits - hopes - groans for salvation.

How to be content with hope?  Hope is the opposite of satisfaction, yet God tells us to be satisfied with it.  Hope is not the certainty of sight.  How do we live on hope in the absence of certainty?  We see the signs.  We trust.  But there is always the seed of uncertainty.  Not doubt - but uncertainty.  It is as fallacious to equate doubt and uncertainty as it is to equate knowledge and belief.  I believe, but I am uncertain.  I am uncertain, but I do not doubt.  If I were certain, I would not hope.  If I were certain, my heart would not pound with anticipation, I would not turn my eyes to God with joy-filled eagerness.  I am not certain: I hope.  But hope, too, is a thing far more profound than ambivalence.  It is a thing backed up by faith, buttressed by love.  I hope because I have faith; I have faith because I love.  One must love God first before one can believe in His promises, and one must believe before one can hope that those promises will be fulfilled.

The question of Genesis: will God be faithful to His promise?  Will we be faithful to ours?  The question is answered: God is always faithful, even when we are not.  But in the midst of every human life in every age, the question must arise again.  The drama of salvation must unfold.  It is not a boring event with a foregone conclusion.  It is a living thing.  Our future with God is an open-ended event, and we press forward with excitement to see its conclusion.  Can you feel the enthusiasm of the early church?  Waiting, singing songs of joy, groaning with anticipation, full of the heady flux of feelings that stir in the breast of anyone asked to wait patiently before being united with the thing - the ONE - they love most in the world.  Maranatha!  Come Lord Jesus!


Thursday, October 24, 2013

Unanswered Prayers

St. Anthony Mary Claret

From St. Augustine's Letter to Proba:
     When, to prevent [Paul] from becoming swollen-headed over the greatness of the revelations that had been given to him, he was given in addition a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet him, he asked the Lord three times to take it away from him. Surely that was not knowing to pray as he ought? For in the end he heard the Lord’s reply, telling him why even such a great saint’s prayer had to be refused: My grace is enough for you: my power is at its best in weakness.      So when we are suffering afflictions that might be doing us either good or harm, we do not to know how to pray as we ought. But because they are hard to endure and painful. . . [we] pray to have our afflictions taken from us. At least, though, we owe this much respect to the Lord our God, that if he does not take our afflictions away we should not consider ourselves ignored and neglected, but should hope to gain some greater good through the patient acceptance of suffering. For my power is at its best in weakness.      Scripture says this so that we should not be proud of ourselves if our prayer is heard, when we ask for something it would be better for us not to get; and so that we should not become utterly dejected if we are not given what we ask for, despairing of God’s mercy towards us: it might be that what we have been asking for could have brought us some still greater affliction, or it could have brought us the kind of good fortune that brings corruption and ruin. In such cases, it is clear that we cannot know how to pray as we ought.
      Hence if anything happens contrary to our prayer, we ought to bear the disappointment patiently, give thanks to God, and be sure that it was better for God’s will to be done than our own.
Prayer is not a test of God.  Our attitude should not be: If my prayer is answered, then I will believe in Him, but rather I believe in God, therefore I know that He hears me when I pray.  The starting assumption must be faith.  Not blind faith, but faith based on what we know God has already done for us.  Because of that faith, we owe it to God to believe, without fail, that He hears us, that He is looking out for our best interests.  For God does everything for us.  Christ said and did nothing that was not for our benefit.  Even when God acts for the sake of His own glory, it is so that we can see and know the source of all our blessings and joy.    

When we begin from the assumption that God exists and hears our prayers, the question then becomes what are we to think if our prayers are not answered?  We know God hears us, so why does He not answer?  It must be because what we are asking for is not good for us.  Paul provides an example of an unanswered prayer, as does Christ Himself.  Augustine reminds us that God always answers our prayers - just not always in the way that we want.  When we make our faith conditional on answered prayers, we are really setting up ourselves as God - making idols of ourselves.  

I am a very impatient person.  I can begin the day in quiet solitude and prayer, but as soon as I encounter other people I find myself easily irritable, upset at being distracted from my own thoughts.  I have prayed for this impatience to be taken from me.  But I wonder sometimes if I am praying for my own sake - so that I can be proud of being a kind, patient, gentle person.  If so, then it is better that my prayer not be answered.  

I hope to learn to pray on behalf of others.  Can I pray that my impatience be taken from me so that those around me are not hurt?  I rejoice that my vices keep me humble, keep  me turning to God every day to help me through.  God, give me patience.  God, give me strength.  God, give me kindness.  My vices remind me that I cannot overcome the imperfections in my soul through my own efforts.  But I do not want to hurt those I love.

What good can come "through the patient acceptance of suffering"?  Perhaps God is trying to teach me to be patient with myself.  The smallest vice sends me spiraling into despair: I will never be good enough.  I am not worthy to be loved.  I am not worthy.  How can I learn to cast my imperfections onto Christ, let them be hidden in His wounds and cleansed by His blood?  It is not that my imperfections "don't matter."  They matter very much indeed.  It is not that I should feel free to ignore my own vices.  But the solution is not to keep chiseling away at my imperfections by my own efforts.  The solution is to actively, by conscientious offering, give my imperfections to Jesus.  To be willing to submit to His purifying fire, over and over again.

In a moment of impatience, perhaps instead of looking at myself, beating myself up for that vice, perhaps it might be better to look to Christ, to say: My God, I offer You this moment in humble gratitude.  Forgive me in Your mercy.  Do what You will.  

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Slaves to Righteousness

St. John of Capistrano

Romans 6:12-18: A reminder that freedom does not equal license.  It seems that some of Paul's listeners, having heard that they were "free" from the law, believed that they no longer had to obey the law and could do whatever they wanted.  If Christ's grace alone is what saves, then what does it matter if we behave badly?  

Paul teaches that we have three choices: we can be bound to sin, we can be bound to the Law, or we can be bound to Christ's grace.  The Law offered a way out of bondage from sin, but the Law was impossible to follow, leaving us again in sin's snares.  Christ provided another Way out of bondage from sin, one that fulfilled the promise of the Law to free us from sin.  But we cannot be free of both the Law and of Christ's grace and expect to be free from the bondage of sin.  A Christian must choose.

Secular freedom rejects this choice.  It upholds autonomy and individualism.  You make your own rules; you "think for yourself"; you obey no one.  You are told that you can and should be both free from the Law and free from Christ's grace.  Christians, however, recognize that such freedom is not freedom.  It makes us slaves to sin.  The only true freedom is freedom in Christ.  And this freedom means obedience to God: it means following God's rules, thinking as God thinks.  

Yet what does "slavery to righteousness," bondage to Christ, mean?  We were not redeemed by Christ so that we could abandon God - although of course God in His goodness allows us to make that choice.  We were redeemed by Christ so that we could offer ourselves back to Him in gratitude for being "brought back to life."  

Medieval notions of chivalry understood this concept.  Read any Arthurian legend: when one knight rescues another, the rescued knight owes a debt of allegiance to the one who saved him.  To renege on that debt was an act of treachery, a grave offense.  We were rescued by Christ; we owe Him our allegiance.

Do we have any metaphors in our own culture for such loyalty?  Paul used the metaphor of slavery: no longer slaves to sin, but slaves to righteousness and obedience.  I am afraid I cannot think of any ways to "inculturate" such a notion into our own setting.  We live in a legalistic, bureaucratized society.  We do things because we are legally or contractually bound to do so, not out of a sense of moral obligation or duty.  We tend to do the bare minimum to fulfill the demands of our contracts, rather than offering our all.  A contractual society has its benefits, to be sure: it is more stable, more dependable, more predictable.  But it also tends not to make moral demands on its members.  It tends to require less.  

This requiring less is seen to serve the cause of freedom.  We do the bare minimum, so that we can be free to engage in our own pursuits independently of our obligations to others.  But, again, Christian freedom is antithetical to such notions.  Freedom is not to be found "independently."  Freedom is found in relationship - in fulfilling our obligations to others, in being bound to serving others.    

Paul reminds us that we are never truly free.  A promise of absolute freedom is a promise only Satan makes; when we accept that false promise, we fall into Satan's trap and away from the source of our life and joy.  We fall into alienation and atomization.  The freedom promised by God, like the freedom given to Adam and Eve, always requires obedience, because this freedom is predicated on love.  And love can only exist in dynamic relationship: when the wishes and needs of all parties are respected and fulfilled.

Our freedom in a fallen world is always hedged with snares.  The best way through is to follow the One who can lead us safely through.  Otherwise we will, inevitably, fall into sin's trap.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Curse, Bless Me Now

The book of Esther: a reminder that when good fortune comes my way I have a duty to use it for the benefit of others.  "Who knows?" Mordecai asks.  "Perhaps you have come to the throne for just such a time as this."  

When bad things happen to us, we are quick to ask: "Why me?"  We often fail to see God's providence in our bad luck: sometimes what we see as a "bad thing" might in fact be preempting an even worse thing that may have happened otherwise.  Getting pulled over for a speeding ticket, for instance, may have prevented a fatal accident further down the road.  This should not be taken to extremes, however.  Sometimes tragedy strikes us and it is, quite simply, tragedy.  No use saying, "Well, it could have been worse."  At those moments when we ask, "Why me?" perhaps we ought to remember that Christ stands with us.  Not to compare miseries with Christ, or to feel guilty about being upset, but to remember that Christ too asked, "Why me?" in the face of his death sentence.  He knows what it is to feel those things.  At those moments we have the honor to stand with Christ in Gethsamane, that garden made holy by Christ's blood and tears.

But when good things happen, we should be equally quick to ask: "Why me?"  How will this good fortune help you to serve others better?  How will it help draw you closer to God?  I mean this in no simple "pay it forward" sense.  I mean a willingness to accept the challenge and the risk attached to every blessing we receive.  Esther's good fortune turns into something that seems like a curse: Mordecai tells her to use her high position to risk death for her people's sake.  In Scripture blessings are always tinged with curses.  Cain receives the blessing of God's protection, but is forever marked as a sinner.  Jacob receives his father's blessing, but is driven from his homeland.  Moses leads the people to the Promised Land but cannot enter with them.  Then: Esther, blessed with beauty, rank, and wealth, now being challenged to use her blessings in self-sacrifice.

It is of course an irony.  Esther is in a position to use her rank to save her people, but in using her rank she risks losing it.  To save one's life one must lay it down.  To receive, one must give.  The blessing of God is a fearful thing.  It is always hemmed with uncertainty.  We must approach it with awful hope.  We must accept the curse of uncertainty if we are to accept the blessing also.  Nor can we hold onto the blessing rigidly.  We cannot hide it in the dirt, hoping to preserve it.  (How silly to interpret that parable as meaning such a trivial thing as one's "talents" and abilities!  As if in our day and age people need more encouragement towards individualistic exhibitionism and self-promotion!  Let your light shine, indeed!)  We must be willing to risk our blessing, risk our inheritance, give away what we have been given.  Such risk requires tremendous faith.  It means taking your most prized possession - the thing you love most in the world - and giving it away without certainty that you will receive it back.  It means being Abraham, ready to sacrifice Isaac, hoping against hope that "God will provide" an alternate sacrifice.  The blessing of God means wrestling with those terrifying fears, that anguish, that despair.

How easy to rationalize away such a decision.  "Why would God give me such a blessing," one would be tempted to ask, "if He only wanted me to risk its destruction?  How is that being a good steward of God's gifts?"  But remember such words are the words of the devil.  The man who hid the coin thought he was being a good steward as well.  The blessing of God comes with the demand that we be willing to give it up when called.  We cannot receive the blessing without that willingness.   

To say, "I have been blessed" means to stand with Noah and Job on the other side of their trials even while we are in the midst of our own.  The blessing of God hounds us as it hounded Jonah was - hounded into the belly of the whale, hounded despite our own prejudices and narrow-mindedness and small-sightedness.  Often we will find ourselves resenting God's blessing when we see the apparent curse attached.  Often the curse will be much more real than the blessing.  "Why me?" we will ask.  "Why did God choose me?"

To be a person whom God blesses take much courage and much strength.  It may even take a certain desperation - a certain recklessness.  It is no job for the cautious and timid-hearted.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Psalm 40 says: "Sacrifice and offering you do not want; you opened my ears.  Holocaust and sin-offering you do not request; so I said, 'See, I come with an inscribed scroll written upon me.  I delight to do your will, my God; your law is in my inner being!'"  Or, more poetically: "You do not ask for sacrifice and offerings, but an open ear.  You do not ask for holocaust and victim.  Instead here am I."  God wants us to open our ears to Him so that He can pour His Word - which is His life - into them.  Thus His word will be "inscribed upon us"; His law will be "in our inner being."  Then we stand before Him - "Here am I" - and offer Him back to Himself.  He fills us with Himself; we offer the Him that He has filled us with back to Him.  We must ready to be filled with Him so that we can give Him back to Himself - for He Himself is the perfect sacrifice, the perfect offering.  The offering must not be something outside of ourselves, something external to ourselves.  It must come from the depths of our very being.  In fact it must be our being.  

Friday, October 18, 2013

To Mary: A Love Letter

I did not have to do it.
            I could have stopped at any point along the way.  I did not have to enter Jerusalem.  I did not have to come at all. 
            The angels would have rescued me from the garden if I had asked.  Do you think my father would not have sent them?  Do you think he did not burn with indignation when they spat on my face and insulted me and whipped me?  Do you think he did not want to strike them down?  Do you think he did not wail with rage at the sight of the blood on my back and on my head?  He would have saved me if I had asked.  But I did not ask.
            In the beginning it was not too difficult to bear.  They whipped me: I could withstand that.  They put the crown on my head: I could endure it.  All right, I thought at every step, if this is the worst they can do – surely I can endure. 
Then: the cross.  No one can know how heavy it is.  So much heavier than it looked, impossibly heavy.  But even when they laid it on my shoulder and it pressed against my spine and crushed my lungs and made it impossible to breathe, I thought: I can do this. 
How strange it seemed, to die by wood.  I had worked with wood all my life; it had been my livelihood, had fed my family, had kept me alive – and now wood was to destroy me.  Does it sound odd to you, Mary, that I pitied the tree?  It could have been forged into something beautiful: a table for a meal, perhaps, or a chair, or a chest for a bride.  Instead it had been roughly hewn into this hideous instrument of death.
As I began to walk with the beam on my back, I found myself praying for the tree.  For my father to bless the tree, forgive the tree.  It knew not what it did.  Then, as though rebelling against my prayer on its behalf, the tail of the beam caught on a stone, and I tripped and fell.  The pain - oh Mary, I tell you I did not want to rise. 
            My mother came.  She watched me fall.  When I saw her beloved face, so full of pain – I thought I could relieve her pain, if I were to die now.  Would it not have been an act of mercy for her, to pray not for deliverance, but for death?  I thought to spare her the sight of my suffering.  But she too had suffered, had sacrificed so much.  Her youth, her reputation.  Do you know what poverty she endured for my sake, just so I could be born?  Very few know.  She rarely spoke of it.  Even I only knew in bits and pieces – a reference to a stable, a manger, a voyage to Egypt.  Her hunger and her hope.  Her face was full of grief, but also full of strength.  She was the strongest woman I ever knew, Mary – she had endured so much.  They will not defeat you, my son, her eyes said as they found mine through the dust.  They will never win, not against you.  She willed me to stand, and I had to obey. 
            Simon came.  Ah, that man – he does not know how holy he is.  He looked so terrified, Mary, when they asked him to help me.  Forced him, I should say.  He had come just to watch the spectacle – just for something to do on a Friday afternoon.  He had no idea what would happen to him when he laid his trembling hand on that cross – he thought he was being asked to rescue me, but in the end it was himself he saved.
            There were others, too, who came – the woman who washed my face, the women who wept for my sake.   My friends did not come – Peter, Andrew, Philip, James – all gone. 
I did not blame them for running away.  I wanted to run too.  Imagine, Mary: you’ve been sentenced to death, you are stuck in a prison, and all the while you hold the key to the prison gate!  You are innocent – it is a travesty of justice that you die – you have every right, every right to escape!  And you hold the key!  You finger the key, hefting its weight, sliding your fingers along its grooves, testing it, slipping it into the lock, preparing to turn it – then taking it out, throwing it aside!  Why?  What sane or rational person would do such a thing?    You see it gleaming at you from the filthy prison floor. You pace back and forth, back and forth, but it stares at you, it calls to you. . . That, Mary, that was the greatest temptation: to flee the prison, to take up the key that lay so close. . .
            The irony, my dear: to use the power of God would have been to deny the power of God.
            
Mary, I fell again. 
            I will not say that my agony at that moment was incomparable.  I see so much suffering, Mary; I do not know how to compare.  I see children who are starving with a hunger that I never knew on earth.  I see men and women who are crucified for decades on crosses of cancer and disease.  I see the visions in the minds of those who are haunted by war.  I see destruction and death spreading like wildfire around the world and I look into eyes deadened by suffering and violence and I hear the silent screams of desperate pain aching for salvation.  My hour climbing that hill – my three hours on the cross – yes, they were torturous beyond endurance, but so many are tortured too beyond endurance.  And still they endure.
            I did not want to endure.  I fell, and wood of that rough cross splintered into my bleeding back and my shoulder broke and the thorns were driven into my head and the dust flew into my eyes and I couldn’t see, couldn’t see why I was doing this anymore.  I heard the crowd laughing and I felt the whip on my shoulder and the kicks to my stomach and I could not hear the voice that I used to hear, the one that reminded me why I had come.  Oh Mary, I wished I had not come at all.  There was a drunken man laughing nearby, and I could hear him say: “Look, ladies and gentlemen, he wanted to be a king and have us bow to him – now see, see how he bows to me!  And in that moment, Mary, I saw the gleam of the key to my escape lying in the dust and I wanted to pick it up – its voice was the only voice I heard. . .
            Then I looked up.
            You know, my love, whom I saw.  Fifty paces to my right, hiding your face behind your shawl – not because you were ashamed and did not wish to be recognized, but because you did not want me to see you weep.  I remembered how that face looked when I first saw it – how disgusting others had found it, tormented and twisted by unknown demons.  You knew only one thing about men, and you sought only one thing from them.  Do you remember when you came to me, offering yourself to me in the only way you knew how?  Oh Mary, even then you were generous, selfless – you wanted to give yourself to something, to someone, but no one had shown you the way!  I took your offer, but not in the way you expected.  I took you, body and soul, and I knew you.  I touched you, and you knew then that love could mean something greater, something better, than what you had ever known before.  And your face became beautiful, Mary – radiantly beautiful, beautiful beyond all reckoning.  I remembered your face as you knelt before me, your tears flowing over my feet.  Your tears - your gift to me - what a precious gift.  They wanted to stop you, to take that moment from you.  But I put my hand on your hair.  I claimed you for my own.
            Mary, I saw your face.   
            In the midst of my loneliness – in the midst of my father’s rage and my mother’s pain, my friends’ abandonment and Simon’s terror, the weeping of the women and the jeering of the men – in view of that gleaming key, waiting for me to snatch it up from the dusty road – Mary, I saw your face, and it was the only face in the world that mattered.
            I stood up, Mary.  I stood and dragged that cross the rest of the way up that cruel hill, I let them strip me naked before your eyes, I let them drive the nails into my wrists – nails thick as branches, nails that cracked bone and split veins.  I drank the vinegar, I let them pierce my side – because I had to save you, Mary.  I saw your face, and I remembered why I had come.  I had come to save you.

Mary – it was because of you.

A Holy Family

St. Luke, Evangelist

My son is dealing with a bully in his kindergarten class.

Perhaps I should not be so blunt.  I am still trying to work out whether Thomas is annoying this other child and provoking his wrath, or if this other child is going out of his way to be cruel to Thomas.  But it does seem that the other boy has spoken to Thomas in an inappropriate and violent way.  

Last night Thomas fell asleep in our bed.  He is going to be too big to want to cuddle soon, so I am soaking up every minute of affection I can get.  As I lay beside him and watched him sleep, I felt a surge of protectiveness and indignation well up in me: how could anyone be cruel to him, tell him that they wanted to kill him, threaten him?  How could anyone exclude him or insult him?  I can't fathom it.  It fills me with anguish. 

My son is my heart embodied.  When he hurts, my heart is replete with pain.

Then it occurred to me: this is how God feels towards us.  When He sees any of us excluded, insulted, threatened.  God is father, God is mother, to each and every one of us.  He is not generically a father or mother, distantly and vaguely.  He is my father, personally, intimately.  He is your father.  We are, all of us and each of us, God's heart embodied on earth.  His adopted children.  When we hurt, He hurts.  

His anger towards sinners is because sin hurts the children whom He loves.  It is no different from my anger towards this bullying child.  God gets angry when His children are in pain.  He gets angry when His children hurt each other, insult each other, exclude each other.  

When we hurt, God wants to gather us in His arms.  He wants to console us.  He wants us to turn to Him.  Imagine the pain, as a parent, to have a child who does not trust you, who will not confide in you.  God feels that way too, when we refuse to share our sorrows with Him.  He longs for us to lay our heads on His chest, to unburden our souls onto Him, to tell Him all our worries and our anxieties.  He hungers and thirsts for us to come to Him, so desperately.  Come to me, all you who labor and are weary, and I will give you rest.  He does not speak these words idly.  They are words of longing.  He wants us to let Him care for us, as tenderly as any mother cares for her children.  

This is the Good News.  God as our Abba.  We do wrong to God when we withhold our tears and our pain from Him.  He wants to share them with us.  This is what He sent His Son to do.

-------------------------------------------------------

If God is our Father, then of course Jesus is our brother: the elder brother, perhaps, who shares His birthright with us, though we, rebellious younger siblings, do not deserve it.  Jesus is the older sibling in the tale of the Prodigal Son: the one who stays home, serves His Father - but who, instead of arguing when the Father welcomes back the wayward son, rejoices with the Father, celebrates and shares with us what is rightfully His.  

Elder brothers get short shrift in Scripture.  Cain and Abel: it is the sacrifice of the younger brother, Abel, that is arbitrarily accepted by God.  Cain has to decide: to accept God's will - "to do what is right."  God's acceptance of Abel's offering is a test to Cain: if  you let go of your jealousy and anger and "do what is right," you too will be accepted.  But Cain does not pass the test: he kills Abel.  God, however, does not wholly abandon Cain: Cain is cursed because he is a murderer, but God still grants Cain his protection.  The "mark of Cain" is a sign both of Cain's crime and of God's everlasting watchfulness over him.

Jacob and Esau: by trickery and deception, Jacob steals Esau's birthright and blessing.  Esau wants to kill Jacob; Jacob flees.  But later, Esau does better than Cain: he eventually forgives Jacob.  When Jacob returns, Esau "runs to meet" him - forgives him before Jacob can even apologize.  For Jacob, receiving Esau's forgiveness is like encountering the "face of God." Nor does God forget Esau: his descendants, the Edomites, lurk on the sidelines of Jacob's family. They too are part of God's family.

It is in this context that we must understand the Parable of the Prodigal Son.  Jesus is the elder brother.  It is Jesus' birthright that we make claim to when we approach God hoping for salvation.  But Jesus is not Cain: He is not jealous, He does not deny our right to be accepted by God.  Jesus atones for Cain's sin: He "does what is right," accepts God's will.  Jesus is like Esau: when we return to apologize for stealing what is not rightfully ours, Jesus runs out to meet us, welcomes us into His arms.  Jesus is not like the older brother in the narrative of the Prodigal Son: Jesus understands that God's inheritance is broad enough for both children - that God has a place for both Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, Israelite and Edomite, Gentile and Jew.  Jesus undergoes the test of both Cain and Esau - and Jesus defeats temptation.